Cartier’s hidden debt to Islamic art unearthed in new exhibition
The Louvre’s acquisition of two exquisite ivory pen boxes in 2018 has sparked an entire exhibition on the hidden connections between the house of Cartier and the world of Islamic art.
Cartier and Islamic Art: In Search of Modernity will run through Feb 20, 2022 at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs (MAD) in Paris, and then will travel to the Dallas Museum of Art, where it will be on view from May 14 to Sept 18, 2022.
A tiara from 1936, made of platinum, diamonds and turqoise
The two boxes, originally made for the court of Shah Abbas (1587-1629), the ruler of present-day Iran, had made their way into the collection of Louis Cartier by 1912.
Cartier, part of the third generation of brothers who turned the family company into an international brand, was something of an aesthete. Wealthy himself by virtue of two advantageous marriages, he assembled a vast collection of manuscripts, artworks and objets that were eventually sold by his heirs.
See also: Chopard celebrates International Day of Happiness with a ‘Feel-Good’ campaign starring Julia Roberts
In researching the provenance of the pen cases, “I realised that no one knew about his personal collection of Islamic art,” says Judith Henon-Raynaud, deputy director of the Louvre’s Department of Islamic Art, who co-curated the show at the MAD.
Henon-Raynaud realised she could use the cases as a jumping-off point, not simply to illustrate Cartier’s nascent Orientalism, she says, but to demonstrate the “importance — and impact — of the discovery of Islamic art on Western artists at the be- ginning of the 20th century”.
It’s a piece of design history, she continues “that has been lost with time, and Islamic art was the departure point for some masterpieces in decorative art and jewellery”.
See also: Brunello Cucinelli Fall-Winter 23 returns to clean lines and sophistication
This tiara from 1914 was made from platinum, blackened steel, diamonds and rubies
Western Europe has been engaged in dialogue with Islamic art for a millennium, but it wasn’t until the early 20th century, Henon-Raynaud says, that Islamic art be- gan to be recognised as containing masterworks, rather than pieces of exotica.
“There was a big exhibition at the MAD in 1903, which is really the beginning of when you can see a scientific organisation and historical classification of Islamic art,” she says. “And then there’s a big exhibition in Munich in 1910 about Mohammed and art, and it marks a major transition in Orientalism, because it’s about the objects for the objects’ sake.”
Part of this shift was simply a consequence of increased globalism; a further factor was Iran’s constitutional revolution in 1906.
“That allowed many paintings and manuscripts to leave the country — pieces from the royal collection of very, very high quality, which people had never seen before,” says Henon-Raynaud. “And this created a very passionate fashion for it in Paris and Europe.”
For more lifestyle, arts and fashion trends, click here for Options Section
A 1902 pendant made from gold, silver and diamonds
Cartier’s interest in Islamic art, in other words, was part of a much broader zeitgeist.
And so it was up to Henon-Raynaud, together with Évelyne Possémé, chief curator of ancient and modern jewellery at the MAD, and Dallas Museum of Art curators Heather Ecker and Sarah Schleuning, to demonstrate how this zeitgeist translated into Cartier’s famous jewellery.
“First, we chose the jewellery from the Cartier collection that seemed to have elements of motifs coming from Islamic art,” says Possémé. “And after, we tried to find a link with the archives and drawings from Cartier’s original collection.
This was facilitated by Cartier, the company, which today is owned by the luxury goods conglomerate Richemont. (Cartier, not coincidentally, is the show’s sponsor.) The company opened its Geneva archives to the curators, who pored over material in an at- tempt to find indisputable connections.
The result is a show of more than 500 pieces of art, showcased in an exhibition design by the architecture firm Diller Scofidio + Renfro.
Some of the connections are clear-cut. “Take an Iranian casket with a very specific design,” says Henon-Raynaud. “We were able to find a rubbing Cartier took of its medallion, and then we found a few drawings where he tried to translate it to a vanity case.”
The original box and the vanity case feature in the exhibition.
Similarly, the pen boxes that sparked the exhibition have straightforward aesthetic parallels; drawings by Charles Jacqueau, a principal designer at Maison Cartier, include motifs from the boxes, and a 1925 gold vanity case in the show, decorated with rubies, diamonds, pearly, onyx and enamel, contains a similar decoration.
Yet another nearly direct copy is a late 14th- to early 15th-century fragment of architectural decoration; that fragment formed the basis of a powder box — the drawing of which accompanies the fragment.
Other objects, while dazzling, have less obvious parallels.
A striking tiara made from blackened steel adorned with platinum, diamonds and rubies is paired with an 11th- to 12th-century bronze mortar.
“The link is the pear shape,” says Possémé, referring to the pear-shaped diamonds and the pear-shaped motifs on the outside of the mortar.
Elsewhere, the curators were able to find a design book in the Cartier archives by Owen Jones, who recreated patterns from the Alhambra Palace in Granada for use in European industrial design.
“We discovered that this incredible diadem [tiara] came from a plate from Jones,” says Henon-Raynaud. “It’s a complete demonstration of the original source material.”
By the 1930s, Cartier had begun to move away from Safavid and Persian influences and towards Mughal designs from India. (Think of its famed “Tutti Frutti” bracelet.)
But there was no specific moment in which Cartier broke with its Islamic in- fluences, which, Henon-Raynaud says, is the point.
“When we started to organise the show, we thought about organising the objects chronologically,” she says. “But nothing emerged — because we made the supposition that one pattern might appear at the beginning — but in fact, there’s no evolution. They used all these Islamic patterns all the time.” — Bloomberg E