Home Capital China Focus

Reopen vs reactivate: Lessons from China's experience

Evan Brown
Evan Brown5/22/2020 06:30 AM GMT+08  • 9 min read
Reopen vs reactivate: Lessons from China's experience
Across the world, investors and non-investors alike are focused on when and how economies will “reopen” after Covid-19 related shutdowns.
Font Resizer
Share to WhatsappShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInMore Share
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

SINGAPORE (May 25): Across the world, investors and non-investors alike are focused on when and how economies will “reopen” after Covid-19 related shutdowns. But, just as important, if not more so, is the question: when will economies “reactivate”? In other words, when and how do consumers feel safe enough to resume normal spending behaviours? When will businesses feel they have created a safe-enough environment to bring back workers and resume pre-crisis levels of production?

It is well understood that a widely available vaccine is still several quarters away. It is also broadly agreed that a reduction in safe distancing policies risks second waves of infections and renewed shutdowns. Therefore, in addition to the tendency for consumers and businesses to be cautious in the aftermath of a recession, we have to monitor behavioural changes based on lingering fears of further virus spread.

In attempting to examine post-virus behavioural changes, we think it most useful to look at China as a leading indicator for Europe and the US. China is a useful barometer given it is a country that experienced a severe bout of the virus but is now roughly two months into its reopening.

There are, of course, major differences across countries, given varying levels of severity of the virus, significant variation in public health infrastructure including testing and contact tracing, diverse macro policy responses, unique reopening strategies, as well as political and cultural differences. So, we have to be cautious in drawing definitive conclusions from China's experience for Western democracies. Still, we would argue that the basic contours of human behaviour are the same across regions, and that Chinese consumer and business behaviours post-reopening can provide important clues as to how things will look in the west.

China's reopening

China's strategy for containing the virus involved a nearly two-month-long lockdown of Hubei, the epicentre of the Covid-19 outbreak in China, which ended on March 25. Outside Hubei, Chinese local officials began opening up their economies two to three weeks after the extended Chinese New Year holiday ended on Feb 3. The real catalyst came during the Feb 21 Politburo meeting, where the central government pushed hard for work resumption while remaining committed to containing any second waves.

This required a strong contact tracing system, surveillance, temperature checking and some travel quarantining requirements. As an example, China mandates that individuals have barcodes on their phones signalling their relative health risk to others before accessing public transportation or entering buildings. Potentially contagious individuals face a mandated quarantine if they are deemed high risk to others. While there have been small outbreaks of the virus in particular localities, most seem to be imported from other countries. In response, China has sharply reduced international travel and mandated strict quarantine guidelines for incoming travelers.

Given the challenge of reopening the economy while making sure the virus is contained, the slope of economic activity was inevitably flat at the beginning. It gradually moved higher as the government and the public gained more confidence in health conditions. The signs of an acceleration of daily activities, as measured in coal consumption, property sales and city traffic congestion levels, are visible around late February and early March, following the aforementioned Politburo meeting on Feb 21. But, two months in, current levels of activity are still somewhat subdued from previous years.

Our colleagues in China do note a change in much of the public's daily routines. Ridership of city public transport has remained far below pre-outbreak levels, with many preferring to drive to work. Indeed, city traffic congestion has almost returned to pre-outbreak levels, and during peak hours is particularly congested. But the length of such peak hours has shrunk, as individuals choose to return home from city centres as opposed to staying out for leisure purposes.

Indeed, while China has largely returned to work, the country has yet to return to spending in earnest. Overall discretionary consumption was down 20% from last year. To be sure, much of this is due to the decline in real disposable income by 3.9% y-o-y in 1Q, the sharpest fall since data became available in 2002, as well as uncertainty about the future. But there is also a general desire to avoid crowds which has led to a slow recovery in discretionary spending.

Shopping malls are open but are much less populated as people have chosen to avoid gathering. Dining out at restaurants is still a fraction of what it was pre-pandemic, as is spending on in-store services like beauty salons. There has been a move away from offline towards online spending, with the former down 13% y-o-y and the latter up 11% y-o-y in March, according to official data. These fail to offset though because offline consumption is still roughly three-fourths of consumer spending. The table displays current and predicted activity levels across various areas of the economy, showing that while the supply side is mostly up and running, various areas of demand will take longer to normalise.

A recent paper from the National University of Singapore has used high frequency data to track offline spending in China. The authors find that consumption patterns show a strong negative relationship to the severity of the health crisis, even accounting for distancing and mobility restrictions. Specifically, when the one-day lagged number of new cases rises, day-to-day consumption declines, and vice versa. This includes data in the first half of April, when most mobility restrictions had been relaxed and concerns grew over potential second waves of infections (either from imported or asymptomatic cases, which the government started to report at the beginning of April).

The authors attribute much of the decline in consumption to uncertainty around the disease itself, suggesting that the more that can be done to manage the public health crisis and make people feel safe, the more genuine a recovery in normal consumption behaviour will occur.

Early lessons

China's two months of the reopening process offers some guidance on what developed economies should expect. One takeaway is that there will likely be a very hesitant and gradual recovery in developed economies. Just because a business has reopened, it does not mean consumers will flock to it if they generally want to stay out of crowded places. A related and logical conclusion is that the safer people feel, whether that is due to low-case growth nearby or trust in the public health infrastructure, the more likely they are to resume semi-normal activities.

There are, of course, reasons to expect a less successful return to normal in developed economies than China's experience. The US and Europe have undergone much more severe outbreaks and longer plateaus of new case growth before declining. While contact tracing and surveillance tools are in development, participation is likely to be voluntary as opposed to mandatory in most situations. And unemployment rates, in the US in particular, are skyrocketing relative to China's. This means a slower reunion of workers and employers as well as a more cautious consumer.

Market implications

The above suggests caution is warranted on risk assets as global equity markets appear to be pricing in a swifter recovery with more certainty than is likely, given China's experience and differences from western economies. The S&P 500 is only down about 10% for 2020, which is quite remarkable given the sharp decline in the growth outlook and lofty valuations entering the year.

We have tremendous respect for the power of coordinated monetary and fiscal policy in providing a bridge through what will be a bumpy road for developed economies. But we would argue that policy support is largely priced in, and that current valuations do not adequately embed the meaningful uncertainty around growth and earnings over coming quarters and years. Indeed, while policymakers have helped provide liquidity where needed, they have not erased solvency risk. Credit and equity performance is likely to be more sideways as markets grapple with the risks of a much more difficult road to recovery, including the potential for second waves of Covid-19. We have moved tactically underweight global equities after the recent rally.

Within equity markets, the rebound has been driven by defensives and growth stocks — which are not part of the typical recovery playbook, but understandable given the prolonged uncertainties we face. Valuation spreads between cyclicals and defensives are at extremes and will eventually snap back. We would expect this to occur in anticipation of a normalisation in global spending patterns — which may require greater visibility on a vaccine.

For now, we favour a moderately defensive equity allocation which should include sectors that are less impacted from lockdowns such as communication services or healthcare in the current environment. As the road to recovery becomes clearer, we would expect the most sold-off sectors (e.g., automobiles, banks, energy) to bottom from an absolute point of view, given they trade at deep recession prices and should eventually recover. Therefore, for investors with a longer time horizon and ample risk tolerance, we believe that buying into those sectors on dips is likely to pay off.

We prefer China and other North Asia economies over their emerging market counterparts as the former have shown greater ability to manage the health crisis and control the outbreak. At the same time, countries like Korea, Taiwan and China are less vulnerable from an external financing point of view and have more room for policy action. We are expressing this view across equities and fixed income, the latter reflected in a preference for Asian high-yield relative to broader emerging market debt. Over time, we expect the overvalued US dollar to weaken and gold to rally, given extraordinary monetary and fiscal stimulus in the US.

Evan Brown is head of multi-asset strategy, investment solutions, at UBS Asset Management

×
Loading next article...
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
Subscribe to The Edge Singapore
Get credible investing ideas from our in-depth stock analysis, interviews with key executives, corporate movements coverage and their impact on the market.
© 2022 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.