3 reasons why US firms are taking longer to go public

3 reasons why US firms are taking longer to go public

Michelle Zhu
09/01/18, 11:24 am

SINGAPORE (Jan 9): It was an encouraging 2017 for the S&P 500, booking a full year of monthly total gains for the first time ever. But the elephant in the room still remains about the shrinking pool US companies going public.

According to data from Dealogic in a Dec 2017 report, the past year had been a record one for US-listed IPO volume and activity since 2014 – with issuance on the US exchanges totaling US$47.8 billion ($63.6 billion) via 179 IPOs.

This, however, remains at nearly half of the record full-year 2014 performance of the US$92.9 billion raised via 292 IPOs – as pointed out by a recent article in The Financial Times, which underscores the gravity of the dearth of IPOs that may in turn affect the US economy.

See: US seeks depth in stock market listings pool

1. Abundant private funding
One cited reason for overall downward trend in US IPOs is the increasing availability of private funding, which allows companies to stay private for much longer compared to before. Similar to unicorns – companies with valuations of over US$1 billion gained through private funding rounds with venture capital (VC) firms – the term ‘decacorns’ were invented by bankers for those whose private valuations exceed US$10 billion.

These include tech giants such as ride-hailing app turned transport company Uber and online property broker Airbnb, whose valuations stand at US$69 billion and US$31 billion respectively but have yet to announce plans of following the footsteps of photo-sharing app Snap.

2. Inability to meet short-term demands   
Shares of Snap, which proved the largest US tech listing of 2012, are now trading significantly below the offer price of US$17, which is attributed to competition from intense competition from Facebook as well as the fact that its early results have failed to meet expectations. This resonates with an existing divide between the self-image of founders as “tech visionaries intent on changing the world” and the short-term demands of public market investors, says FT.

3. Regulatory burdens    
On the note of marked declines among smaller companies, it is also argued that the complexity and regulatory costs of going public presents challenges to these firms, which also tend to trade less often and hence see dimmer prospects of being covered by analysts.  

Citing market participants and pro-business groups, FT highlights calls for further reforms to the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, which removed the regulatory necessity for companies exceeding 500 shareholders to publish financial information. It was this requirement which helped to trigger the IPOs of Google and Facebook, and the absence of it that allows the latest batch of growing tech companies the freedom to stay private longer.

So what can be done to reverse the listings decline

One suggestion by Paul Donahue, Morgan Stanley's head of equity capital markets, is for central banks to dial back stimulus – which would then push more private companies to public markets as private capital inflow declines.

Others argue it is only a matter of time for the majority of US companies to go public for the benefits of doing so, such as allowing its shareholders to cash out their holdings, as well as providing a currency for mergers and acquisitions (M&As) and a certain level of legitimacy.

This sentiment is echoed Deepak Kamra, partner at VC firm Canaan. In his words, “The public market is the ultimate arbiter of truth”. 

Can IBM remake itself with hybrid cloud play Red Hat?

SINGAPORE (Nov 19): Legendary corporate icons can plunge from their exalted status to irrelevance in little or no time. The unfolding saga of General Electric, the world’s largest company by market capitalisation until Microsoft overtook it at the start of the tech boom in 1999, is a case in point. GE, which has been slowly shedding assets since the global financial crisis in 2008, has seen its downward slide escalate over the past two years. Its once lofty stock has plunged 77% from its recent July 2016 peak, and is down 87% from its July 2000 all-time high when it ....

Malaysia reopens submarine probe, questions former PM Najib

KUALA LUMPUR (Nov 20): Malaysian anti-graft authorities have reopened investigations into a contentious submarine deal 16 years ago involving former prime minister Najib Razak, the latest corruption probe facing the embattled Najib. Since losing a May election, Najib has been charged with multiple criminal offences and has been subject to corruption investigations, some linked to a multi-billion dollar scandal at state fund 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB). Najib has pleaded not guilty to all charges. Investigators with the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC) are now also l....

Noble comes under investigation for potential accounting & regulatory breaches

SINGAPORE (Nov 20): Singapore authorities are launching an investigation into beleaguered commodities trader Noble Group and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Noble Resources, amid the group’s controversial debt restructuring exercise. According to a joint statement issued on Tuesday by the Singapore Police Force (SPF), Commercial Affairs Department (CAD), Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA), Noble is suspected of making “false and misleading statements” as well as breaches of disclosure requirements under the Securities and Future....